Reviews and Comments


For the Love of a Dog by Patricia B. McConnell, PhD.

                Hez-o-meter  *** ½

In her latest book, Patricia McConnell plays on an age-old question asked by many a dog-lover:  Do our beloved dogs experience emotions like humans?  Of course this is a question that cannot be completely answered.  And in the opinion of many experts, this question should remain unanswered.  Why waste the time trying to search for an answer to such a question that can never be proven valid?

I will admit that I have asked the question myself.  I vividly remember one day this past winter when I briefly touched on the subject.  As I was sitting on my couch I turned to look at one of my dogs staring out the window.  What is she thinking?  Is she feeling like me about this frigid day, wondering when she’ll see the grass again?  Longing for a day of sunshine when she can enjoy the outdoors and the fresh warm air?  Or is she simply passing time due to boredom because her owner hasn’t felt motivated enough to do more than dump some kibble in her dish?  Or maybe she’s watching that squirrel across the yard?  Yes—the latter is a likely answer.  She likes to chase squirrels. 

But McConnell would like to think in a more abstract way.  And this book is obviously biased.  It gives the average person enough background on the anatomy and function of the brain that one may think they have an educated opinion after reading the book.  The sad truth is that McConnell gives the reader just enough information to understand what she wants the reader to understand and no more. 

The major argument that McConnell stresses is this:  How can we be so vulgar to assume dogs are incapable of experiencing emotions when we don’t have a complete grasp on the concept of emotions for our own species?  But, as written by Peter Caruthers, unless animals are able to think about thinking, they may have what look like emotions, but they can’t feel them.

I’m not saying that I agree with Caruthers.  Honestly, both thoughts sound completely absurd in my mind.

Although I was not a huge fan of this book, I was impressed on how the book was written.  For a person with medical background, the book will be a slow read.  McConnell repeats herself unnecessarily, and for someone who already knows how the brain works, they will find themselves skipping paragraphs.   But, for the average citizen, it is very informative.  It breaks the function of the brain down into terms that are comprehendible to someone with no previous education related to neurochemistry.  McConnell also provides scientific backup to all of her theories.  There is quite a lengthy reference section at the end, along with a well-written instruction on how to teach a dog to “Stay”.  And she also provides informative footnotes at the bottom of almost every single page.  The footnotes were by far my favorite part of the book. 

The chapters are broken up into different subjects.  The emotions of Love, Happiness, Anger and Fear have an entire chapter devoted to each of them.  Emotional Expressions, Emotions and the Brain, and Pavlov have their own chapters as well. 

Another nice point is the photo section provided in the center of the book.  Sixteen centerfold pages are filled with photos of the emotional expression captured on dogs’ faces as well as the same expressions on the faces of humans.  McConnell makes reference to these photos quite frequently in the discussion of happiness, anger and fear. 

I would recommend this book for the pet owner who wants to learn to read the emotional state of their dog.  I have to admit that I am now more aware of my dogs being nervous in a certain situation versus excited as I may have thought at one time.  In fact, I can’t even look at a dog anymore without assessing their basic emotional status.

Unfortunately I still feel there is so much that we don’t know about our own brain chemistry, let alone that of a dog.  And until we can get inside the brain of a dog we will never know for certain what they are thinking, feeling, or otherwise experiencing.  The brain is a very complex thing which, in my opinion, is not meant to be understood.  In closing, I would like to share the best lesson I learned from this book:  Our emotional connection to our dogs is pure, primal, and as basic as oxygen and water. 

 

God  knows (and Carole),  I am not a professional book reviewer, I simply like to talk about the books I have read.  So, thank you for allowing my indulgence, and remember that is all this is! 

Duma Key by Stephen King published 2008  

 This book is rich in character development and light on horror.  The main characters are complex and interesting, they are also depressed, struggling to make sense of life.  They are trying to find ways to pull themselves out their personal life tragedies and ensuing blue funk. Despite the underlying sadness,  these characters are quirky, interesting, and yes, even fun.

A little of the quirkiness rubbed off on me, as I have taken on a new term of endearment for everyone I know of either gender, “muchacho.” The second quirk or idiom I have taken away from the novel came from a sentence where sidekick character Jerome Wireman says to Edgar Freemantle, the main character,   “… f***-it and crawl in a bucket”;   I have modified this little phrase to: “f***-it in a bucket.” Alarmingly, it has been my response to most everything since. The reversion to childhood has begun. 

The supernatural is an element of the story, but it is so subdued it is almost like a metaphor for something else —- fill in the blank on how you want to apply it. This could almost be an Oprah book. :)  

If you are looking for something like The Stand or The Black House  series, this is not it.  If you enjoyed Bag of Bones  you will enjoy Duma Key.   I enjoyed all of the previously mentioned works and I enjoyed Duma Key.  

 

World Without End
2007, Dutton Adult, Publisher

I was anxious to devour this 1,000 pages-plus book after thoroughly enjoying Pillars of the Earth. “World” is touted to be the sequel to “Pillars” Only be the loosest of definitions. “World” takes place in Kingsbridge as did “Pillars” and some minor references to the characters 200 years earlier. The relationships of the new characters to the old seemed diluted, I panicked. Is this all? I really wanted more of the same people from Pillars. This new cast was so different. I was feeling a bit disappointed, I wanted more of a tie in to Pillars. It was not long before the new day, the new Kingsbridge —200 years later—came to life for me and just like antecessors gone 200 years so were my thoughts of the people from Pillars.

Impact of Ken Follett’s writing is powerful. Some of the passages in World can be traumatic. When you come to the storyline of the Parish being robbed, I would recommend skipping skip the rest of that chapter. I had a suspicion I should do that very thing, but was worried I would miss some valuable bit of information. Let me save you from this. The parish robber is flayed alive. You can read about it in graphic detail if you wish but if you are even a tiny bit squeamish do not read it. I am about average when it comes to my sensitivity to horrific details. This made me physically sick. I had trouble falling asleep for two nights as the scene keep playing in my mind—seriously, you do not need to read about the flaying of the parish robber.

This book is a stand alone from Pillars. Either can be read first, both should be read if you enjoy good writing. Not to take anything away from Pillars but I enjoyed World even more the Pillars.

Was this book really over 1,000 pages long? It is. Yet not long enough and over too soon. Ken Follett is smart leaving us wanting more. Is he going write books to fill in the 200 year gap between Pillars and World? I hope so.

The Michigan Association for Purebred Dogs.  Does very important work fighting anti-dog legislation.  This is important for all people who love dogs not just those with purebred dogs. You can become a member as an individual. Please join and support with a donation!

Who says we don’t have complex issues in animal history?

Chimp cannot be declared a person, Austrian court rules
 The Associated Press

A chimpanzee cannot be declared a person, Austria’s Supreme Court has
ruled, activists said Tuesday.
An animal rights group had sought to have the chimp, Matthew Hiasl Pan,
declared a person in hopes of gaining guardianship of the animal.
The shelter where Matthew has lived for 25 years is going bankrupt,
threatening to leave him homeless. Donors have offered to help support him, but
under Austrian law, only a person can receive personal gifts.
The Vienna-based Association Against Animal Factories sought to have him
declared a person and petitioned to be appointed Matthew’s
trustee.
But the high court upheld a September ruling by a judge in the town of
Wiener Neustadt rejecting the petition, the group said Tuesday.
The rights group said it would take the case to the European Court of Human
Rights.
Matthew and another chimp at the shelter, Rosi, were captured as babies in
Sierra Leone in 1982 and smuggled to Austria for use in pharmaceutical
experiments. Customs officers intercepted the shipment and turned the chimps
over to the shelter.
Organizers said they may set up a foundation to collect donations for
Matthew, whose life expectancy in captivity is about 60 years.
But they argue that only personhood will ensure that he isn’t sold outside
Austria.


>>

The Michigan
Legislature has introduced Senate Bill 626 to prohibit certain dog races for the
purpose of wagering or gambling. Since the bill does not define “dog racing” or
“wagering” or “gambling” the Michigan Association for Pure Bred Dogs believes it
“opens the door” to protests from animal rights groups to challenge certain dog
show events such a “agility, fly ball, lure coursing races, sled dog racing,
coon dog races, etc. Please read the position paper in light of the following
quote from the
LACE>MichiganLACE> Penal Code
(750.301).
>>

“Any person or his or
her agent or employee who, directly or indirectly, takes, receives, or accepts
from any person any money or valuable thing with the agreement, understanding or
allegation that any money or valuable thing will be paid or delivered to any
person where the payment or delivery is alleged to be or will be contingent upon
the result of any race, contest, or
upon the happening of any event not known by the parties to be
certain
, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment
for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than
$1,000.00.”>>

The question should be
asked of your legislators “does the act that prohibits “certain dog races,” some
of which put the many competitive events such as fly ball racing, lure coursing,
agility trials, coon hound water races, etc. at peril by the “vague” definitions
in the act.  >>

 >>

Contact your Senator
and ask this question:  what is the motivation behind SB 626?  Please forward
any response you receive from you Senator.  Thanks.  >>

 >>

Al Stinson, DVM.
Director of Legislative Affairs,
LACE>MichiganLACE> Association for Pure
Bred Dogs and
LACE>MichiganLACE> Hunting Dog
Federation.>>

Position
Paper>>

Senate Bill
626 (S-5)>>

> >

The LACE>MichiganLACE> Association for Pure Bred Dogs and the
LACE>MichiganLACE> Hunting Dog Federation oppose Substitute
S-5 of Senate Bill 626 as written.>>

> >

This
legislation prohibits certain dog races; prohibits the simulcasting of certain
dog races; and prescribes penalties.  A
person shall not hold, conduct, or operate dog racing for the purpose of
wagering or gambling.”>>

> >

Wagering or
gambling in the bill is not clearly defined [Sec. 1 (c)] even though it does
make a statement of what the law does not include.  (Does not include the payment of a purse or
prize to the owner, manager, or trainer of a dog in connection with a race in
which the dog races.) 
>>

> >

This statement is not helpful for the
owner, manager, or trainer to understand what other activities may be prohibited
as wagering or gambling as defined in a standard dictionary.
Does MCL 750.307  Gambling: prima facie evidence
apply?>>

> >

 Quoted from the WEBSTER’S NEW WORLD
DICTIONARY of American English (
LACE>Printice Hall, New
York
LACE>
copyright 1994:>>

> >

Wager n.
1. Bet: 2. a pledge to do something or abide by an
outcome:>>

> >

Gamble vi. 1. to play games of chance for money.
2. to take a risk in order to gain some advantage. vt. to risk in gambling; bet,
wager; n. an act or undertaking involving risk or a
loss.>>

> >

The dog
industry, one of the most economically important animal industries in
LACE>MichiganLACE>, sponsors a wide variety of competitive
activities such as conformation shows, obedience trials, hunting trials, sled
dog racing, and others that meets the definition “to take a risk in order to gain some
advantage.”
  What are some of these
advantages?>>

  • Pride and satisfaction of
    owning an animal of distinction.
    >>
  • A means of advertising the
    performance, appearance and/or of the owner’s breeding
    program.

    >>
  • Enjoyment of the
    opportunities for recreational activities with their dogs.
    >>
  • For breeders, the
    opportunity to increase the reputation of their dogs by demonstrating their
    performance in competitive events, resulting in increased sales of dogs.  Cash entry fees (risks) are a general
    requirement for participation.  This cost
    is used to finance the cost of the competition and pay the costs of the awards
    to the winners.>>

 >>

The
competitive public events sponsored by
LACE>MichiganLACE> dog clubs in which the exhibitors “take a
risk to gain some advantage” could result in a violation of this act.  Practically all of these competitive events
require the entrant to pay a fee.  There
is no guarantee of a win with such a fee. 
Thus all that money is essentially at risk to the exhibitor of any dogs
entered in the competition.>>

> >

The Michigan
Association for Pure Bred Dogs and the Michigan Hunting Dog Federation are
composed >>

> >

> >

> >

of over 100
clubs that are located throughout
LACE>MichiganLACE>. These clubs are engaged in competitive
recreational activities that could be interpreted as violating this act, either
by the club, their exhibitors or guests, depending upon the interpretation of
the words “gambling” and “betting” and “wagering.”   The events attract entries from throughout
the
LACE>United
States
LACE> and
LACE>CanadaLACE>. 
A very important
LACE>MichiganLACE> tourist
attraction.>>

> >

The
information provided by the proponents of the bill at the hearing of the
Committee on Commerce and Tourism on
ATE year=”2008″ day=”21″ month=”1″>January 21,
2008
ATE>:>>

> >

  SB 626 - 
Information Sheet
- no author given)
>>

 
SB 626 - Selection of Relevant News
Articles
(no author
given)>>

> >

raised some
disturbing questions about the true purpose of this legislation and its effect
on other forms of recreational and competitive activities of the dog
industry..>>

> >

The statement
within SB 626 - Information Sheet,
[the paragraph entitled What this legislation is NOT intended to
do
: -  Represent the interest  or further the cause of any particular
organization, animal rights group, rescue or other animal welfare entity”
]
 plus the text of the document [“SB
626 ? Selection off Relevant News Articles”
]  
is a more plausible explanation of the
real intent of the legislation’s supporters. 
The thrust of these documents is mainly related to propaganda from
anti-racing organizations with a biased animal activist view of the risks dog
are exposed to in the “racing
sports.”>>

> >

The risks and
perils of greyhound racing are no different from those of other forms of
competitive activities.   Similar risks
are encountered in other racing events such as sled dog races, coon hound races,
lure coursing and agility trials,  If
this legislation is enacted in Michigan in the current session (it was rejected
in the 1996 session) the animal rights lobby’s next effort will be to stop sled
dog racing, then coon hound racing.  All
under the guise of preventing gambling and cruelty. The animal rights proponents
are already trying to stop sled dog racing events with accusations of it being
cruel to sled dogs.  Next to be
prohibited will be hunting events (dogs used in large game hunting are at
considerable risk.)  Then, the
legislature will be asked to outlaw hunting, one of the ultimate goals of the
animal rights agenda.>>

> >

The Michigan
Association for Pure Bred Dogs and the Michigan Hunting Dog Federation urge you
to defeat SB 626.  If the sport of dog
racing is detrimental to the public as a gambling and wagering event, then ban
other forms of gambling supported by
LACE>MichiganLACE>’s statutes.  Likewise, if dog racing is a sport of
cruelty, then all animal racing events such as horse racing, and indeed, even
boat racing would be considered cruel and should be prohibited (to save the fish
who are at risk for damage from propellers.) 
These bans could also be extended to training and competing with horses
in timed international Olympic events. 
They too have risks of serious injury (cruelty?)  >>

 >>

Take a well-known leader’s
advice:>>

You should not examine legislation in the
light of the benefits it will convey if properly administered, BUT, in the light
of the wrongs it would do and the harm it would cause if improperly
administered.>>

Lyndon
Johnson>>

36th
President of the
LACE>United
States
LACE>>>

Prepared
by:>>

Al W.
Stinson, BS,
LACE>DVM, MSLACE>, Director of Legislative
Affairs>>

LACE>MichiganLACE> Association for Pure Bred Dogs &
Michigan Hunting Dog Federation>>

1915 Epley Rd., Williamston, MI, Phone: 517-655-5363, Fax:  517-655-3724, >>

E-mail:  LSFC2@aol.com

>>

Next Page »